Austin Castellaw
@austincastellaw
Austin Castellaw
Revenge Votes are mostly happening in small DAOs in which members usually allocate to all members. If someone gives you an amount that you don’t find acceptable, you will also allocate a small amount to this member.
cryptouf.eth • DAOs, Coordinape and beyond
Yet these two roles are in opposition to each other. A token needs to be exchangeable in order to be liquid. But the more liquid a token is, the less effective it can be as a pure signal of reputation.
Andreessen Horowitz (AZ) • A Novel Framework for Reputation-Based Systems
A thread about @Coordinape, DAOs, decentralized compensation and its potential and pitfalls, and what it all might mean for the future of work:
Li Jintwitter.comDAO Compensation and
Doesn’t this sound great? Well, yes! Now, this is just one of the many examples of this ability to “Web3-anize” assets, i.e to convert from the older way of doing things to a newer model. I would like to further expound on this idea by just taking you on a journey to envision what an increasingly tokenized world could look like.
x_fren • Not Found
0/ Token incentives are a popular way to distribute ownership to people that provide a useful service
But as we've seen, some of these distributions are easy to game and are less effective in hitting their key objectives
Here's my framework for thinking about this 👇
Ashwathtwitter.comairdrop and
Distributing tokens to users through airdrops and ongoing liquidity incentives: Airdrops distribute tokens to users based on their past actions. They may be high-value users of other protocols or have previously used the present protocol — however, this approach rewards past behavior over future commitment. There is no assurance that these people
... See more