-Spencer describes how they use coordinape to reward people who chose a more flexible track where contributors work on projects and submit proposals on how much they should receive in compensation.
So, in summary, single, dual, or triple token models are irrelevant if the game's sink and sources are not thoroughly considered + target demographic + game objectives. Personally, I favor a dual or triple token model that separates investor and player incentives.
0/ Token incentives are a popular way to distribute ownership to people that provide a useful service
But as we've seen, some of these distributions are easy to game and are less effective in hitting their key objectives
Here's my framework for thinking about this 👇
Dope Wars, Briq, Loots, The Realms, The Ninth, and Influence, to name a few, belong to this category.In this article, we would like to explore the strengths and weaknesses of each macro-category.
Coordinape offers a novel model for determining compensation in a way that can be more fair and reflective of actual contributions: since peers vote, there’s not as much emphasis on appeasing a single person, and power is more distributed throughout the organization.