Adam Zeiner
@dezein
a persistently curious generalist (parading as a strategic designer, facilitator, and organizer) attempting to wrangle complexity
Adam Zeiner
dezein.info
By mapping the components of individual services (or portfolios of services) against these two axes, perhaps we can explore their relationship to systems change. To what extent are we tweaking around the edges of the existing system, versus changing the behaviour of the system itself — and how ambitious is the effort?
Adam Groves • From service design to systems change
Boosting innovation initiatives with knowledge graphs - DataScienceCentral.com
datasciencecentral.com
Knowledge Work and
Mental Models and
NOBL Collective - Change and Transformation Consulting Firm
nobl.io
I was personally struck by the uniformity of this thinking across time and discipline – in general, there are six different levels of escalating complexity, each interdependent, each with an important role.Important to note here that in my table, "Leverage" is not the same thing as "Time to complete something."
Clay Parker Jones • Pace Layers for Organization
Identifying UX metrics that tell the team’s story; that are mapped directly to what happens when we deliver well-designed products and services
Jared Spool • Your Necessary First Step to Creating Powerful UX Metrics
Don't Fight the System - Change the Rules and the System Will Change Itself! - The Systems Thinker
Robert S. Graythesystemsthinker.com
System Change and
Marketplaces and
We started thinking about different kinds of subject and object engagements that involved maybe multiple subjects, multiple objects, unintended engagements, or engagements that happen without either the user or the artifact having awareness of that engagement. What are the different permutations that are possible?