Sublime
An inspiration engine for ideas
The danger is that evidence-based apologists may treat people like “cognitive machines, defined above all, by thought and rational operations”4 and therefore see their job primarily as pouring the right information “into” non-Christians and getting the wrong information “out” so that they will assent to the propositions of Christianity.
Josh Chatraw • Apologetics at the Cross: An Introduction for Christian Witness
Opus Dei: An Objective Look Behind the Myths and Reality of the Most Controversial Force in the Catholic Church
amazon.com
Believing in Order to See: On the Rationality of Revelation and the Irrationality of Some Believers (Perspectives in Continental Philosophy)
amazon.com
We come now to a question which had already troubled both Plato and Aristotle. Can God know particular things, or does He only know universals and general truths? A Christian, since he believes in Providence, must hold that God knows particular things; nevertheless there are weighty arguments against this view. Saint Thomas enumerates seven such
... See moreBertrand Russell • History of Western Philosophy
we will gain wisdom into how Edwards thought about the problem of nominalism and how he addressed it.
Owen Strachan • Jonathan Edwards on True Christianity (The Essential Edwards Collection Book 4)
