Sublime
An inspiration engine for ideas


If it is rationally acceptable to believe those things without evidence, why can’t it be rationally acceptable to believe in God or Christianity without evidence?
Brian K. Morley • Mapping Apologetics: Comparing Contemporary Approaches

“Classical” apologists, such as Norman Geisler, R.C. Sproul, and William Lane Craig, insist that, prior to making a factual, historical case for Jesus Christ, one must establish God’s existence—generally using the classical, Aristotelian proofs, or sophisticated variants on those proofs (such as Craig’s favourite, the medieval, Arabic kalam cosmolo
... See moreJoseph M. Holden • The Comprehensive Guide to Apologetics



Conscience and Its Enemies: Confronting the Dogmas of Liberal Secularism (American Ideals & Institutions)
amazon.com