Sublime

the very cofounder of the theory of evolution was an intelligent-design proponent.

random mutation and natural selection can’t accomplish anything remotely like what has been ascribed to them.

Darwin’s mechanism can’t begin to make a comparatively simple bacterial flagellum, let alone the human brain. Thus all of the intellectual work built on that vaporous foundation falls with it.

Evidence of common descent is routinely confused for evidence of Darwin’s mechanism.

If research clearly shows that the effects of natural selection and random mutation are limited, why do so many smart scientists still hold that Darwinism is the major force behind the development of life?

A surprising but compelling conclusion is that Darwin’s mechanism has been wildly overrated—it is incapable of producing much biological change at all.

not only is the flagellum itself irreducible, but so is its assembly system. The assembly process and the flagellum together constitute irreducible complexity piled on irreducible complexity.