Sublime

goal of life; thus responsibilities and standards of justice come to be seen as shackles.

Everything for the State; nothing outside the State; nothing against the State (Mussolini).

The State dominates the nation because it alone represents it (Hitler).

commentator

this general thrust, of a very Jewish Jesus who was nevertheless opposed to some high-profile features of first-century Judaism, seems to me the most viable one if we are to do justice, not just to the evidence of the synoptic gospels (they, after all, are easy game for any critic who wants to avoid their implications) but more particularly to the

My book The Authority of God’s Law Today (Texas: Geneva Press [708 Hamvassy Road, Tyler, TX 75701], 1983) explains the position outlined above, providing a popular presentation of theonomic ethics that is much shorter and less technical than Theonomy.

“Classical” apologists, such as Norman Geisler, R.C. Sproul, and William Lane Craig, insist that, prior to making a factual, historical case for Jesus Christ, one must establish God’s existence—generally using the classical, Aristotelian proofs, or sophisticated variants on those proofs (such as Craig’s favourite, the medieval, Arabic kalam cosmolo

Your premises must measure up with respect to two counts, truth and strength.