Sublime

But this same wisdom hasn't yet indicated quite what that means, nor how one might be able to draft a critique of networks.

Amid these gaps, implications sit.

Muñoz describes ephemeral rhetoricity as continuous and gestural, as embodied and expired, as the expanse beyond point and poles, as the not-yet-here, as motions teeming with potentiality.

rule of law continues to play a central role in the context of the contemporary passage: right remains effective and (precisely by means of the state of exception and police techniques) becomes procedure. This is a radical transformation that reveals the unmediated relationship between power and subjectivities,

rhetoric’s plurality, wherein rhetoric is more accurately construed as rhetorics, as multiple means for attending to the truths (even the false truths) of a given situation.64 Importantly, plural rhetorics, as James Berlin maintains, do not locate their differences in the “superficial emphasis of one or another feature of the rhetorical act. The

the indeterminacy of it all appeals to me.

that people—or, if you like, automata, algorithms—can and do act in situations that are not well defined.