Sublime
An inspiration engine for ideas
the first scenario, the countries of the OECD implement a uniform carbon tax such that the net present value (NPV) of the abatement cost equals $2 trillion, the NPV of $250 billion per year for ten years. The discount rate is 5% per year. Costs are discounted to 2009. This is achieved by a carbon tax of $700/tC, starting in 2010 and rising with the
... See moreBjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
BREAKING: America’s new Secretary of Energy just exposed the entire climate scam
“Media & politicians NEVER bothered to actually learn about climate change.”
$2 TRILLION to lower fossil fuel use by 2%
They’re not saving the planet—they’re robbing... See more
Marc Nixonx.comAppendix: the FUND Model
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
Prioritizing Development: A Cost Benefit Analysis of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals
amazon.com
Substantial reduction of carbon emissions thus requires a carbon tax of at least $50/tC – which is just barely justifiable at the mean estimate for a pure rate of time preference of 3%.
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
