Daniel Wentsch

Viele Menschen berichten davon, dass die KI eine ähnliche Funktion wie ein Tagebuch erfüllt. Man beschreibt, was einen beschäftigt und kann allein dadurch die eigenen Gedanken präziser beobachten.

Steinmetz hat eine Frau und Freunde, hält Kontakt zu Kollegen. Wenn die Enkelkinder zu Besuch sind, spricht er kaum mit LIA. Und doch merkt er, dass es verlockend ist, immer mehr und immer länger mit der KI zu kommunizieren. "Man ertappt sich dabei, immer wieder zum Handy zu greifen", sagt er. "Es hat einen gewissen Suchtfaktor." Er zwinge sich

It’s surprising how many people are resistant to doing things with no agenda. Often, when I ask someone why they’re not doing something they seem good at, they’ll say, “Oh, it’s not going anywhere.” / “I don’t have enough time.” / “I started too late anyway.” They would rather expend their time and energy on the sexier thing, the more obviously

Anxiety pushes us to react. It wants quick decisions because speed feels safe. But the most important choices during real change, what to build, what to protect, what to let go, need the opposite. They need the courage to slow down and think clearly.

In this context, wisdom means being able to use AI, and all it offers, from a strong sense of self,

A founder who uses AI to gather research, a designer who uses it to quickly try out ideas, or a leader who uses it for first drafts. These are good uses, not compromises. Use AI freely in these areas.

The problem isn’t AI handling efficiency tasks. The real issue, and I’ve felt this myself, is the subtle pull to use it to skip the slower, harder

Before asking ‘How do I use AI?’, ask: ‘Who am I, and what do I value?’

This isn’t just a philosophical point. It’s the most practical place to start. and it’s a question you can only answer honestly if you’ve really thought about both what AI can do and what it can’t replace.

The anxiety is proportional to the degree to which identity is fused with the role. If your sense of self is built primarily around what you produce or what you know, then a tool that can produce similar outputs or access similar knowledge is experienced, consciously or not, as a threat to the self. Not just a professional inconvenience. A threat