Critical Thinking
CT is akin to ‘playing devil’s advocate’. That is, once a claim is made, one should second-guess it in as many conceivable ways as possible, in a process similar to the Socratic Method. Through asking ‘why’ and conjecturing alternatives, we ask the individual—be it another person or even ourselves—to justify the decision-making. It keeps the
... See morefrom An Evaluative Review of Barriers to Critical Thinking in Educational and Real-World Settings by Christopher P. Dwyer
Ideas related to this collection