Saved by Sixian
Viral Effects Are Not Network Effects
Jay Matthews added
However, it’s also true that a lot of network-based utility only is realized at some level of scale. (As per NFX: “The simplified definition of network effects is that they occur when a company’s product or service becomes more valuable as usage increases.)
Eugene Wei • Status Games: Engineering Scarcity in a World of Abundance
sari added
One important lesson here is that engagement matters to network effects. A first level understanding of network effects is that they occur when more users = more value for existing users. That’s true, but go one level deeper, and you realize it’s actually the amount of usage that matters.
James Currier • Does Real Identity Matter for Networks?
Sixian added
Network Effects are the foundation of many great Silicon Valley technology companies/ You need users to make a product work – network effects are the results of positively connecting people through technology which organically makes that technology better.
Tim Ferriss • #550: Andrew Chen — Metaverse, Metrics, and Meerkats
sari added
This is where the classical definition of a “network effect” is wrong. I redefine it so that it’s not one singular effect, but rather, three distinct, underlying forces: the Acquisition Effect, which lets products tap into the network to drive low-cost, highly efficient user acquisition via viral growth; the Engagement Effect, which increases inter
... See moreAndrew Chen • The Cold Start Problem: How to Start and Scale Network Effects
Packy McCormick and added
Data Network Effects, 6 Elements
NFX • What Makes Data Valuable: The Truth About Data Network Effects
Sixian added