added by sari · updated 2y ago
The promised land of the singing frog
- So if we want to understand why network effects often fail to lead to marketplace monopolies, we should start by considering the Thumbtacks against the Taskrabbits, the Tinders against the Bumbles, and the Upworks against the Fiverrs, all in relentless competition against mirror-image services. These services all have network effects in the traditi... See more
from The promised land of the singing frog by David Phelps
sari added 3y ago
- Marketplaces that create entire new experiences for happiness, however, like Airbnb and Twitter and TikTok, can make users happier than any substitute simply because they can’t be cloned. These platforms aren’t merely letting users fix pain points with an interchangeable solution but offering up content that itself will give their lives added meeti... See more
from The promised land of the singing frog by David Phelps
sari added 3y ago
- Monogamous, non-fungible marketplaces are terrible business propositions: users will find a specific option that they like and leave the platform to continue with that individual forever. Promiscuous, non-fungible marketplaces, however, are the best business propositions: users will need to continue returning to the platform both to fulfill their i... See more
from The promised land of the singing frog by David Phelps
sari added 3y ago
- Marketplaces that eliminate pain points—like Coinbase or Uber—can make users meaningfully happier than the incumbent hackable exchange and medallion cabs, but they struggle to make users meaningfully happier than their own clones, the Krakens and the Lyfts.
from The promised land of the singing frog by David Phelps
sari added 3y ago
- Content, however, is not fungible; it is unique not only to a content-creator but to the medium they use. Marketplaces that become content marketplaces win the market because it is impossible to get their individuated content anywhere else.
from The promised land of the singing frog by David Phelps
sari added 3y ago
- Let’s start with some twins: Coinbase and Kraken, if you like, or Uber and Lyft. The buyers and sellers on the exchanges are interchangeable for users, as are the taxi drivers and riders. Supply and demand in both cases is fungible: it doesn’t matter who you’re trading with, just that there is someone to complete the transaction.
from The promised land of the singing frog by David Phelps
sari added 3y ago
- After a few decades in which giant aggregators have become the dominant marketplaces while original media companies often seem relatively small, this framework is a reminder that the most successful marketplaces are always media marketplaces.
from The promised land of the singing frog by David Phelps
sari added 3y ago
- Another way of seeing the fungibility spectrum, then, is as a measure of how difficult it is to transfer service from one platform to another. As Max Glassman put it in reviewing this argument, “it's all about switching costs… It would be difficult to find our favorite leaders' thoughts in 280 characters elsewhere.”
from The promised land of the singing frog by David Phelps
sari added 3y ago
- My own explanation, though, is that it's a question of fungibility. To have a truly winner-takes-all marketplace requires non-fungible supply and, especially, demand.
from The promised land of the singing frog by David Phelps
sari added 3y ago