added by sari · updated 2y ago
The Network Union
- A network state is a social network with a moral innovation, a sense of national consciousness, a recognized founder, a capacity for collective action, an in-person level of civility, an integrated cryptocurrency, an archipelago of crowdfunded physical territories, a virtual capital, and an on-chain census that proves a large enough population, inc... See more
from The Network State: How To Start a New Country by Balaji S. Srinivasan
Jason Levin added
- In contrast, a blockchain-based social network would be operated based on pre-programmed rules that enable anyone who abides by these rules to participate. Any change to these rules requires the consent of multiple stakeholders, the process of enacting this change is transparent.
from The Token Society by Dror Poleg
sari added
- Network states, in Balaji's view, are a "de-centralized center" that could create a better alternative.
from What do I think about network states? by Vitalik Buterin
Juan Orbea added
- Some believe that decentralization requires the entire social network to be on a blockchain. This is unnecessary and even undesirable. Social networks generate petabytes of data every year, which can be very expensive to store on-chain. Blockchains also make it difficult to delete data forever, which is a desirable feature for users. A network desi... See more
from Sufficient Decentralization for Social Networks by Varun Srinivasan
sari added
- Networks can produce value in different, sometimes completely bizarre, and inconspicuous ways. The efficiency of value production in networks could greatly outperform traditional organizations due to network effects, low operation costs, resource pooling, and trustless automation.
from How can we understand and classify value creation in the web3.0 economy? by Vasily Sumanov
Jason Badeaux added
- Most of the people who talk about user ownership of networks are focused on creating new city-states based on blockchain technology and egalitarian ideals, but comparatively little attention has been paid to reforming existing networks based on these same principles. I think this is a mistake.
from Twitter as a City-State by every.to
Lillian Sheng added
- On the dimension of utility, Facebook's network effects continue to be pure and unbounded. The more people that are on Facebook, the more it's useful for certain things for which a global directory is useful. Even though many folks don't use Facebook a lot, it's rare I can't find them on Messenger if I don't have their email address or phone number... See more
from Invisible Asymptotes — Remains of the Day by eugenewei.com
Luc Cheung added
- Balaji's argument in The Network State, as I am interpreting it, is as follows. While we do need political collectives bound not just by economic interest but also by moral force, we don't need to stick with the specific political collectives we have today, which are highly flawed and increasingly unrepresentative of people's values. Rather, we can... See more
from What do I think about network states? by Vitalik Buterin
Juan Orbea added