We think we are reaching the end of knowledge – but we are only reaching the limits of our instruments. The new paradigm begins exactly where the old one ends. And right now, we are standing there. In the crack. Where more and more people experience phenomena that academia cannot explain – but that keep happening anyway. Where science says... See more

Conscious thought is an extreme bottleneck. It handles only a vanishingly small part of the information flowing through the body. The rest is processed outside language – in the nervous system, in the unconscious, in what cannot yet be said but already knows.

It is not dangerous to believe in more than we can prove. What is dangerous is allowing fear of the intangible to make our world smaller than it is.

And perhaps that is exactly what we are facing now: not a new answer, but a new way of listening. To science – yes. To the body. To the dream. To the story. To what cannot be seen, but can be felt. To begin seeing the whole human being as a carrier of information – not only through data, but through experience, resonance and relation.

a kind of double reality: the measurable world and the experienced world.

When academia cannot measure something, two things happen. Academia calls it “unscientific”. That is correct within its methodological framework – but that framework is not the whole of reality.

Perhaps the knowledge of the future is neither purely rational nor purely mystical. Perhaps it is relational: a dialogic state between what we can measure and what we can experience. Science is one language. Spiritual experience is another. But they coexist, in the same room, without being in conflict. They are simply two different ways of seeing... See more