
The Dialectical Self: Kierkegaard, Marx, and the Making of the Modern Subject

what remained of this tumultuous period was its deep suspicion of any sense of meaning that had pretensions of universality.
Jamie Aroosi • The Dialectical Self: Kierkegaard, Marx, and the Making of the Modern Subject
“man would rather will nothingness than not will.”
Jamie Aroosi • The Dialectical Self: Kierkegaard, Marx, and the Making of the Modern Subject
his philosophical idealism
Jamie Aroosi • The Dialectical Self: Kierkegaard, Marx, and the Making of the Modern Subject
The radical claims of the nineteenth century seemed verified by the lived reality of the twentieth.
Jamie Aroosi • The Dialectical Self: Kierkegaard, Marx, and the Making of the Modern Subject
Granted, intense criticism of Hegel began as early as the decade following his 1831 death, most notably in the work of the Young Hegelians.
Jamie Aroosi • The Dialectical Self: Kierkegaard, Marx, and the Making of the Modern Subject
In the case of Kierkegaard, this research is more recent but of equal importance. For instance, see Jon Stewart, Kierkegaard’s Relations to Hegel Reconsidered,
Jamie Aroosi • The Dialectical Self: Kierkegaard, Marx, and the Making of the Modern Subject
while the meaning that we assert as true might be less than the full truth, our endless attempt to create such meaning reveals underlying truths about ourselves.
Jamie Aroosi • The Dialectical Self: Kierkegaard, Marx, and the Making of the Modern Subject
In that it held to traditional values, opposing changes or innovations to them.
it also served the developmental role of saving individual autonomy because it offered us a meaning by which to live