The Compleat Strategyst: Being a Primer on the Theory of Games of Strategy (Dover Books on Mathematics)
amazon.com
The Compleat Strategyst: Being a Primer on the Theory of Games of Strategy (Dover Books on Mathematics)
The above two cases illustrate a fundamental distinction among games: It is important to know whether or not the sum of the payoffs, counting winnings as positive and losses as negative, to all players is zero. If it is, the game is known as a zero-sum game. If it is not, the game is known (mathematicians are not very imaginative at times) as a
... See moreA perennial difficulty in modelmaking of the analytical (as opposed to wooden) variety is the illness which might well be known as criterion-trouble. What is the criterion in terms of which the outcome of the game is judged? Or should be judged?
Generally, when the larger of the row minima is equal to the smaller of the column maxima, the game is said to have a saddle-point; and the players should stick to the strategies which intersect at the saddle-point. To discover that there is a saddle-point, each player must examine the game both from his own and the enemy’s point of view. He lists
... See moreThe method which will be presented is identified by the catch phrase Game Theory or, time permitting, the Theory of Games of Strategy. If this is your first encounter with that unlikely sequence of nouns, the sole reaction is probably: Why? Well, the idea takes its name from the circumstance that the study of games is a useful and usable starting
... See moreThus we come to believe it is significant. to count the number of sets of opposing interests around the table, rather than the bodies.
This is an important concept in Game Theory, that of mixed strategies: the concept that a player should sometimes use one pure strategy, sometimes another, and that the decision on each particular play should be governed by a suitable chance device. We can anticipate that this will be a feature of most games, that it will fail to appear only when
... See morethe sensible object of the player is to gain as much from the game as he can, safely, in the face of a skillful opponent who is pursuing an antithetical goal. This is our model of rational behavior. As with all models, the shoe has to be tried on each time an application comes along to see whether the fit is tolerable; but it is well known in the
... See moreWe have indicated that the number of persons involved is one of the important criteria for classifying and studying games, ‘person’ meaning a distinct set of interests. Another criterion has to do with the payoff: What happens at the end of the game?