The Ancient City: A Study of the Religion, Laws, and Institutions of Greece and Rome (Illustrated)
Numa Denis Fustel de Coulanges
amazon.com
The Ancient City: A Study of the Religion, Laws, and Institutions of Greece and Rome (Illustrated)
Numa Denis Fustel de Coulanges
amazon.comOne loved his country only as much as he loved the form of government that prevailed there for the moment; and he who found its laws bad had no longer anything to attach him to it.
The Athenians, like many Greek peoples, saw no better way than to draw lots; but we must not form a wrong idea of this procedure, which has been made a subject of reproach against the Athenian democracy; and for this reason It is necessary that we attempt to penetrate the view of the ancients on this point. For them the lot was not chance; it was t
... See morefew women; it was the right of intermarriage, — that is to say, the right of contracting regular relations with the Sabine population. For this purpose a religious bond must be established between them; he therefore adopted the worship of the Sabine god Consus, and celebrated his festival.613
The living could not do without the dead, nor the dead without the living. Thus a powerful bond was established among all the generations of the same family, which made of it a body forever inseparable.
“As the kings displayed pride and rigor in their commands, the greater part of the Greeks took away their power, and left them only the care of religion.”465
We can understand, too, that such a marriage was indissoluble, and that divorce was almost impossible.
The domestic hearth had a high priest, who was the father of the family; the hearth of the cury, had its curio, or phratriarch; every tribe, in the same manner, had its religious chief, whom the Athenians called the king of the tribe. It was also necessary that the city religion should have its supreme priest.
This convocation was called the calatio, whence came the name of calends, which was given to this day.
What we know with the greatest certainty concerning the client is, that he could not leave one patron and choose another, and that he was bound, from father to son, to the same family. If we knew only this, it would be sufficient to convince us that his condition could not be a very desirable one. Let us add that the client was not a proprietor of
... See more