
Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture

allows us to use fandom as a
Henry Jenkins • Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture
hypothesis” rather than as a textual property.
Henry Jenkins • Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture
Hollywood hybrid, the recombinant form, which assumes that selected features of recent hits can be spliced together to make a eugenic success
Henry Jenkins • Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture
attractiveness of these texts originate at least partially from their relevance to pre-existing modes of fan culture, specifically to the fans’ own exploration of homoerotic romance and their discovery of a women’s tradition of such stories in Japan.
Henry Jenkins • Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture
desire to engage in larger conversations that impact the culture (also
Henry Jenkins • Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture
critics suggest that it was the rich interplay of writers, editors, and fans which allowed science fiction to emerge as a distinctive literary genre in the 1930s and 1940s
Henry Jenkins • Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture
Readers are not always resistant; all resistant readings are not necessarily progressive readings; the “people” do not always recognize their conditions of alienation and subordination.
Henry Jenkins • Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture
is not a property of fictions so much as it is an interpretive fiction fans construct in the process of making meaning of popular narratives.
Henry Jenkins • Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture
Repeated viewings have placed increased attention on these narrative gaps and kernels, requiring their fuller integration into the fans’ metatextual comprehension