
Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits

for milk production is around 3.5% of total EU 15 anthropogenic GHG emissions, of which a substantial share is related to CH4
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
as a stand-alone policy for climate change, a large-scale forestry sequestration program is close to, but it does not pass a B/C test.
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
Given that forecasts are imperfect, agents are constrained in many ways, and markets are often distorted – particularly in the areas that matter most for the effects of climate change such as water, food, energy, and health
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
a framework that explicitly models the connections between mitigation, climate change impacts, and adaptation is still missing.
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
Natural CH4 sources include wetlands, termites, oceans, and gas hydrates
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
carbon price signal is insufficient to induce the technology development investments required to limit global temperature increase, and that the technology-led policy will shift the bulk of technological decision making from the private sector to the public sector.
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
proper optimal mitigation paths (solution C)
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
10% loss of the monsoon-dependent production might add $4.5 billion to $9 billion to
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
we use the median, the mean, and the 90-percentile values calculated by Tol. The median SCC value is 48 $/tC, the mean 71 $/tC, and the 90-percentile is 170 $/tC.