
Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits

climate change, one may wonder whether stimulating economic growth or emission abatement is the better way to reduce the effects of climate change.
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
total cost studies
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
In contrast to small-scale public investment projects, the climate change problem is: • international • intergenerational • uncertain and ambiguous • non-marginal • (partly) irreversible and non-linear.
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
GWP estimate of about 25 compared to CO2 over a 100-year time horizon
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
All these measures aim at improving feed conversion efficiency,
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
It is more constructive to consider the range of policy responses that we have, and to identify what we can do in different areas.
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
the mean global value taken from studies that employed reasonable discount rate and value of life assumptions is less than $25 per ton of CO2.10
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
transactions between agents within the same economic system. There is no loss of primary resources; therefore only second-order effects (whose sign is a priori ambiguous) affect GDP and income.
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
are not held constant across solutions.