
Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits

general there are other driving forces for installing wastewater collecting and treatment facilities, above all sanitary and hygienic ones
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
GWP of CH4 is 23 relative to CO2.
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
The costs of SRM fall into three broad categories. These include the direct costs, such as the expense of developing and deploying SRM technology. They also encompass the indirect costs, which might be thought of as the harm that might result from using these technologies. Finally, they include the transaction costs entailed by SRM. These costs mig
... See moreBjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
10% loss of the monsoon-dependent production might add $4.5 billion to $9 billion to
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
an overall CH4 leakage of around 1.4%,
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
The volumes of material needed annually
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
At 2.13 GtC equivalent to1 ppm carbon, this means that the current (idealized) costs of AC are about $1 trillion per reduced ppm of atmospheric CO2 at a cost of AC equal to $500/tC.
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
at $500 MTC−1 AC costs about $1 trillion per ppm.
Bjørn Lomborg • Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits
Resources are scarce.