added by Kasper Jordaens and · updated 2y ago
Philosophers on GPT-3 (
Note that this is different from whether the GPT3-generated text is humanlike (which it often is) and correct (which is also roughly is). But when we read something we usually don't want to be told what we already know: we want to be exposed to novelty and GPT3 does a mediocre job at this.
from Nintil - Images and Words: AI in 2026 by Jose Rincon
sari added
- ChatGPT-4 was pitted against 151 human participants across three divergent thinking tests, revealing that the AI demonstrated a higher level of creativity. The tests, designed to assess the ability to generate unique solutions, showed GPT-4 providing more original and elaborate answers.
from AI Outshines Humans in Creative Thinking - Neuroscience News by Neuroscience News
Mary Martin added
"I function like a more curated but less efficient version of GPT. My sentences are not generated by A.I., but they are largely the synthesis of my favorite authors."
"I enjoy reading human writing because I like getting mad at people. Perhaps the personal quality in writing is a happy accident, and a lot of journalism could be replaced with an imme
... See morefrom What’s the Point of Reading Writing by Humans? by Jay Caspian Kang
Brian Sholis and added