In addition, if major medical journals, and their peer-reviewers, are unable pick-up research fraud. Then what, exactly, is the point of them. To quote Richard Horton again (sic) half of what is in them is may simply be untrue ... ‘ Which half, please. Oh, you don’t know. ’

We also cannot hold open the door open, ever again, for those actors who most certainly do not have your best interests at heart. Those who crave power, above all. Many of them joined the game during Covid and threw their money and influence into the ring, and pushed, and pushed, with great enthusiasm. Happy to use fear to gain power, and also make... See more

In addition to the uselessness of peer-review, Richard Horton has previously stated the following about scientific research:

‘ Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.’

Do I think all researchers are corrupt, and that all research is corrupt? No, of course not. However, if three quarters of medical researchers are using ‘ questionable research practices’ then the vast majority of research is, at best, untrustworthy. At worst, crumple, throw, bin.

Surely peer-review should have picked up the Surgisphere fraud? You think? The same article quoted Richard Horton, editor in chief of the Lancet, where the Surgisphere papers were published. He had this to say in his defence:

‘... the peer review process is not designed to capture research misconduct.’

To be honest I don’t feel this is the most... See more

Marcia Angell was the editor the New England Journal of Medicine for many years. It was, and remains, the number one medical journal with regard to its ‘impact factor.’ She had this to say:

‘It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative... See more

There are several reasons for this. I do not intend to look at them all, only a few. The first difficulty I ran into is that when the pandemic hit there were no Sars-Cov2 tests available. It took several months to ramp the system up.

So, how could anyone write Covid-19 on a death certificate, if they didn’t know the patient was infected with... See more

Think upon that. Twenty-five million ‘cases’ in one year made up entirely by false positive tests. If the true figure was 5%, this number rises to very nearly seventy-five million. Yes, seventy-five million wrong Covid-19 diagnoses. Which is very close to the entire population of the United Kingdom.

Moving further down the line. How accurate were the tests themselves? Or, to be more specific. How many false positives were there. This represents a massive elephant in the room that was barely mentioned at the time. Most people are blissfully unaware there even was a problem.

However, this could well have been the biggest issue of all. If false... See more