
Knowing Scripture

Two Myths
R. C. Sproul • Knowing Scripture
if we find thirty-six words in Ephesians that are found nowhere else in any of Paul’s writings, we might conclude that Paul did not or could not have written Ephesians.
R. C. Sproul • Knowing Scripture
championed the broad-constructionist perspective, which radically changed Constitutional interpretation.
R. C. Sproul • Knowing Scripture
“That’s your interpretation, and that’s fine for you. I don’t agree with it, but my interpretation is equally valid. Though our interpretations are contrary and contradictory, they can both be true. Whatever you like is true for you, and whatever I like is true for me.”
R. C. Sproul • Knowing Scripture
The first such goal is to arrive at the objective meaning of Scripture and to avoid the pitfalls of distortion caused by letting interpretations be governed by subjectivism.
R. C. Sproul • Knowing Scripture
Knowing from whom you have learned them (v. 14).
R. C. Sproul • Knowing Scripture
human sexuality,
R. C. Sproul • Knowing Scripture
A common mistake in biblical interpretation and application is to give a proverbial saying the weight or force of a moral absolute. Proverbs are catchy little couplets designed to express practical truisms. They reflect principles of wisdom for godly living. They do not reflect moral laws that are to be applied absolutely to every conceivable life
... See moreR. C. Sproul • Knowing Scripture
The primary rule of hermeneutics was called the “analogy of faith.”