
Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation

Don Kirkpatrick wrote that using pre- and post-tests is a good idea. In the modern business world where things move quickly and resources are stretched, their use is only recommended when required by your stakeholders, when there is a specific business need for the data, or when the program can be modified based on pre-test findings to save resourc
... See moreJames D. Kirkpatrick • Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation
By definition, it is some combination of the organizational purpose and mission, combined with the financial reality of sustained existence and success.
James D. Kirkpatrick • Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation
Leading Indicators: Short-term observations and measurements that suggest that critical behaviors are on track to create a positive impact on the desired results
James D. Kirkpatrick • Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation
Active execution and monitoring of required drivers is perhaps the biggest indicator of program success for any initiative.
James D. Kirkpatrick • Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation
Training effectiveness: Training and follow-up leading to improved job performance that positively contributes to key organizational results
James D. Kirkpatrick • Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation
Let learners vote on course design.
James D. Kirkpatrick • Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation
Instead, the usage pattern of mobile devices (many quick, short accesses versus fewer, longer accesses on a laptop) supports different ways of assisting learners. It is very much about “just-in-time” assistance versus a “just-in-case” approach.
James D. Kirkpatrick • Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation
Track use of various resources that might be employed for informal learning.
James D. Kirkpatrick • Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation
overall satisfaction with the program, engagement in the program based on how the trainer taught it, relevance of the program material to the participant’s job, and general view on the program quality.