the ability to generate a full overload does not necessarily imply that a complete recovery of actual physiological systems must occur between microcycles. In fact, chronic and accumulated fatigue from other training sources make that virtually impossible in most training situations, considering that most athletes train multiple times per week, wit

While training intensity is a measure of how hard you train, training volume is a measure of how much you train. The definition of volume is largely dependent on what sport or physical activity is being described. Fundamentally, volume is the amount of physical work being done, where work is defined as average force multiplied by the distance over

Because overloading is the central process of training and the one that necessitates recovery, recovery must occur during the interval between two overloading training sessions, which target the same system or ability.

working athletes outperforming lazy ones season after season, their first conclusion may be to instruct their athletes to constantly do as much they can. The failure to see the ceiling for the “more is better” axiom is where coaches fall short. Secondly, these anecdotal prescriptions are coupled with a culture probably as old as sport itself: one t

operational range of training states, as compared to the unicorn of being completely, holistically

Few coaches want to be known as the easy coach; conversely, many would love to be known as a hard-nosed contriver of various sport-related tortures.

This group of concepts - which we term the “Training Volume Landmarks”-

To cause the best gains, however, that following stimulus has to be greater in magnitude than the one prior.

presenting a full overload, that is, one that’s both challenging and progressive, is critical to getting the best rates of gain in ability. As a result, chronic elevations of training volume above MRV are counterproductive, and hence ill advised.