/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/12907051/akrales_180911_2943_0002.jpg)
added by Isabelle Levent · updated 2y ago
Getty Images bans AI-generated content over fears of legal challenges
Alex Dobrenko added
Adobe scolded for selling ‘Ansel Adams-style’ images generated by AI
Justin Mather added
The other insidious side of this whole battle is that these large companies are going to start selling this generated content to people as stock imagery
- AI images are quick and easy to make. They look great at first sight, and they quickly replaced the use of stock images. But, like everything cheap and easy, they come with trade-offs. A short critique of the pure AI image.
from AI Art is The New Stock Image
Alex Dobrenko and added
- Where AI differs is its interaction with data and rights. Unlike coding assistants trained on open-source software, most commercial image generation tools are trained on copyrighted work. It’s a non-consensual, extractive practice in an already-precarious industry. It’s always hard to put the tech genie back in the box, but I think this is a case w... See more
Jasmine Sun on AI and creator rights
- But AI generated art cannot be used legally commercially because it cannot be copyrighted.
from Robots vs. Lawyers by Muddy Colors
Leo Guinan added
Isabelle Levent and added
Isabelle Levent added
Jia added
Giving rise to stumbles like Figma’s Make Design producing an app that looks like Apple’s Weather app
What are we doing to creative expression and originality when we rely on GenAI and its copycat derivatives?