Saved by sari and
Geeks, MOPs, and Sociopaths in Subculture Evolution
The sociopaths quickly become best friends with selected creators. They dress just like the creators—only better. They talk just like the creators—only smoother. They may even do some creating—competently, if not creatively. Geeks may not be completely fooled, but they also are clueless about what the sociopaths are up to.
meaningness.com • Geeks, MOPs, and Sociopaths in Subculture Evolution
One reason—among several—is that as soon as subcultures start getting really interesting, they get invaded by muggles, who ruin them. Subcultures have a predictable lifecycle, in which popularity causes death. Eventually—around 2000—everyone understood this, and gave up hoping some subculture could somehow escape this dynamic.
meaningness.com • Geeks, MOPs, and Sociopaths in Subculture Evolution
Mops are fooled. They don’t care so much about details, and the sociopaths look to them like creators, only better. Sociopaths become the coolest kids in the room, demoting the creators. At this stage, they take their pick of the best-looking mops to sleep with. They’ve extracted the cultural capital.
meaningness.com • Geeks, MOPs, and Sociopaths in Subculture Evolution
Before there is a subculture, there is a scene. A scene is a small group of creators who invent an exciting New Thing
David Chapman • Geeks, MOPs, and Sociopaths in Subculture Evolution
Subcultures were the main creative cultural force from roughly 1975 to 2000, when they stopped working. Why?
meaningness.com • Geeks, MOPs, and Sociopaths in Subculture Evolution
Geeks can refuse to admit mops. In fact, successful subcultures always do create costly barriers to entry, to keep out the uncommitted.6 In the heyday of subcultures, those were called poseurs.7 Mop exclusion keeps the subculture comfortable for geeks, but severely limits its potential. Often there’s a struggle between geeks who like their cozy lit... See more