Cracks in Pomo
It’s a commentary on Latour’s own career spent critiquing the perceived unimpeachability of scientific knowledge, and his feelings of frustration regarding how his critique ends up in the same mushy stew as anti-science conspiratorial thinking which he finds abhorrent. The essay was deeply influential in the postcritique movement, which argued for
... See moreThe fact is that almost NO philosopher defends these strong foundationalist epistemologies. But almost NO philosopher denies that both everyday and scientific discourse are guided by reasonably reliably, pragmatic, effective standards. Both philosophical positions these days are found somewhere in the middle.
What distinguishes so-called... See more
What distinguishes so-called... See more
Does Jordan Peterson understand post-modernism?
