I want to be clear: I’m not against LLMs .
LLMs are incredibly powerful tools, and can be a huge boon to engineers. They can automate repetitive tasks, generate code snippets, help with brainstorming, assist in debugging, ... and this can frees up engineers’ time and mental energy, which could be channeled into more complex, creative... See more
LLMs are incredibly powerful tools, and can be a huge boon to engineers. They can automate repetitive tasks, generate code snippets, help with brainstorming, assist in debugging, ... and this can frees up engineers’ time and mental energy, which could be channeled into more complex, creative... See more
Article
A key concern with LLMs lies in their training data.
The data can be biased, contradictory sometimes, but those data contain solutions to known problems.
If an engineer wants to “reinvent the wheel,” an LLM might offer a solution (good or bad, depending on the prompt). But when faced with truly novel problems, LLMs often provide unreliable responses,... See more
The data can be biased, contradictory sometimes, but those data contain solutions to known problems.
If an engineer wants to “reinvent the wheel,” an LLM might offer a solution (good or bad, depending on the prompt). But when faced with truly novel problems, LLMs often provide unreliable responses,... See more
Article
This idea summarizes why I disagree with those who equate the LLM revolution to the rise of search engines, like Google in the 90s. Search enginers offer a good choice between Exploration (crawl through the list and pages of results) and Exploitation (click on the top result).
LLMs, however, do not give this choice, and tend to encourage immediate... See more
LLMs, however, do not give this choice, and tend to encourage immediate... See more
Article
The skill of the future is not 'AI', but 'Focus'