Saved by Brian Sholis and
Care Tactics | Laura Mauldin
Against Technoableism: Rethinking Who Needs Improvement (A Norton Short)
Ashley Shew • 5 highlights
amazon.com
“crip technoscience studies” critiques how disability-related technologies have been designed for and not by disabled people.
Michele Ilana Friedner • Sensory Futures: Deafness and Cochlear Implant Infrastructures in India
Crip technoscience, as a concept and practice, raises questions about who can hack, tinker, and design and the role of these practices in actually dismantling infrastructures of power—although it perhaps still foregrounds material infrastructure and objects.
Michele Ilana Friedner • Sensory Futures: Deafness and Cochlear Implant Infrastructures in India
There seems to be less discussion or interest in funding technologies that are supposed to make life easier if you are experiencing disability. Say, new ways or spaces to build community if you’re isolated or elderly, or somehow make the world and your life more accessible than it otherwise would be if you’re disabled.
Tamara : It gets back to that... See more
Tamara : It gets back to that... See more