Build: An Unorthodox Guide to Making Things Worth Making
Fig. 3.6.1 Geoffrey Moore first mapped out when different people are open to new products in his book Crossing the Chasm. But that’s not the whole story. It’s also critical to understand where V1, V2, and V3 of your product will fall on this chart and how that changes what you focus on—disruption, refinement, or the business.
Tony Fadell • Build: An Unorthodox Guide to Making Things Worth Making
Mapping product development onto the phases of adoption
One of the main pulls to create the App Store was actually from corporations. As businesses began adopting the iPhone, they reached out to Apple, asking to make applications for their employees and sales. If Apple wanted people to continue using their phones for work, they’d have to give the enterprise the ability to create its own apps. And so the
... See moreTony Fadell • Build: An Unorthodox Guide to Making Things Worth Making
Even if you transition from B2B to B2C, your marketing must stay B2B to deliver a consistent narrative and brandImagine selling Overlay as an enterprise product to enable the people who love Genesis, to use or build with it at work
So when you’re choosing your board members, here’s what types of people you should be considering:
Tony Fadell • Build: An Unorthodox Guide to Making Things Worth Making
On choosing board members
All acquisitions come down to what you’re trying to do when you’re buying a company—do you want to buy a team? Technology? Patents? Product? Customer base? Business (that is, revenue)? A brand? Some other strategic assets?
Tony Fadell • Build: An Unorthodox Guide to Making Things Worth Making
On motivations for acquiring a company
After you’ve launched your V1, then two to four times in that year, you should be announcing something to the world. New products, new features, new redesigns or updates. Something meaty that’s worth people’s attention.
Tony Fadell • Build: An Unorthodox Guide to Making Things Worth Making
On the frequency of shipping
In an interview I’m always most interested in three basic things: who they are, what they’ve done, and why they did it. I usually start with the most important questions: “What are you curious about? What do you want to learn?”
Tony Fadell • Build: An Unorthodox Guide to Making Things Worth Making
On evaluating a candidate
Adulthood is your opportunity to screw up continually until you learn how to screw up a little bit less.
Tony Fadell • Build: An Unorthodox Guide to Making Things Worth Making
Bill would always say that if there was any potentially surprising or controversial topic, the CEO should go to every board member, one-on-one, to walk them through it before the meeting. That allowed them to ask questions, offer different perspectives, and then the CEO had time to take those thoughts back to the team and revise their thinking, pre
... See moreTony Fadell • Build: An Unorthodox Guide to Making Things Worth Making
On presenting difficult topics to a group, ie. the board
Tesla was in danger of becoming just one more electric car in a market flooded by them. So they started electrifying different kinds of vehicles and innovating charging networks and retail and service, batteries and supply chains. They’re ensuring that the competition has to fully disrupt every part of their operations to even enter the race. Once
... See moreTony Fadell • Build: An Unorthodox Guide to Making Things Worth Making
Disrupting ancillary parts of the business so that the consumer is locked into your ecosystem bc of the value you deliver at an ecosystem-level, especially if/when your main product is commoditized
To get Amazon onto people’s phones and change how people shopped online, you didn’t need to build a whole new device. You just needed a really great app that would live on everybody else’s devices. I told him: I wouldn’t make the phone. He made the phone. I didn’t get the board seat. When it launched, the Fire Phone did everything he had promised—b
... See moreTony Fadell • Build: An Unorthodox Guide to Making Things Worth Making
On disrupting too many things at once, and executing poorly in the process