Ambitious theories of consciousness are not "scientific misinformation"
Erik Hoeltheintrinsicperspective.com
Ambitious theories of consciousness are not "scientific misinformation"
Nobody knows how consciousness works – but top researchers are fighting over which theories are really science
Tim Baynetheconversation.com
Then I Am Myself the World: What Consciousness Is and How to Expand It
Christof Koch • 33 highlights
amazon.com
Perhaps the most concise way to describe this emerging paradigm in science is the realization that consciousness, rather than being an accidental by-product of neurophysiological and biochemical processes in the brain, is an integral component of the universe itself.
Renn Butler • Pathways to Wholeness: Archetypal Astrology and the Transpersonal Journey
This Idea Must Die: Scientific Theories That Are Blocking Progress (Edge Question)
amazon.com
An experiment seven years in the making has uncovered new insights into the nature of consciousness and challenges two prominent, competing scientific theories: Integrated Information Theory (IIT) and Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT).
- IIT suggests that consciousness emerges when information inside a system (like the brain) is highly connected