
A World Without "Whom"

readability may be an issue, which is why I’d opt for pre-op rather than preop, side-eye rather than sideeye, and gun-shy rather than gunshy
Emmy J. Favilla • A World Without "Whom"
Bryan A. Garner’s Garner’s Modern English Usage, also known to many in the editing world as the bible
Emmy J. Favilla • A World Without "Whom"
foot and inch marks—technically known as the prime and double prime symbol, respectively—(
Emmy J. Favilla • A World Without "Whom"
Italicize franchise names, however, when referring to a media series: e.g., “the Saw movies,”
Emmy J. Favilla • A World Without "Whom"
Traditionally, curly (or so-called “smart”) quotes have had a use distinct from straight (also called “regular” or the not-so-nice “dumb”) quotes. Pairs of the former are used to enclose quoted material—and they’re “smart” enough to know when to open a quote and when to close it, hence the moniker—while the latter should be reserved for, say, the s
... See moreEmmy J. Favilla • A World Without "Whom"
it’s generally a safe bet to hyphenate the following: •Compound modifiers consisting of two or more adjectives that precede a noun and act as a single idea, like silly-looking monster (to differentiate from a jovial monster whose primary responsibility is to look).
Emmy J. Favilla • A World Without "Whom"
•Bantu names (East/Southern Africa) typically place the family name first and given name second.
Emmy J. Favilla • A World Without "Whom"
the names of edible things that are derived from a proper noun (usually a geographic location, sometimes a person’s name)—especially when the item in question consists solely of the proper noun (e.g., Brie, as opposed to Brussels sprouts)—are typically capitalized.
Emmy J. Favilla • A World Without "Whom"
Descriptivists believe that language should be defined by those who use it; they observe and record, and so “correctness” is an ever-changing notion based on how people are writing and speaking at any given time.