Austin Castellaw

Isn’t it weird how the tables have turned? Now, let’s look at a Web3 version of this.

Algorithmic — The value and supply of algorithmic stablecoins are controlled by code. If the demand for the coin starts to increase rapidly, the protocol automatically creates more coins to bring the price down. If the value drops too low, some of the supply is burned to bring the price back up.

For example, Starknet's virtual machine, powered by Cairo, unleashes this true potentiality as their native programming language is not bounded by the EVM constraints.

Short answer is “No”…. But of course nothing is perfect! I will explain why and propose some possible solutions. But I also know the team behind Coordinape is working hard to constantly improve it! Let’s improve it all together and build the perfect tool!As it was mentioned above, one issue is members not allocating “properly”. Properly is probably... See more

Web3 emphasizes the freedom of the individual. In an ideal Web3 world, creator A is on a decentralized platform Z instead, which is run by smart contracts and gives creators more of their revenue. On top of that, platform Z probably has some tokens like $ZDAO that control governance - and this tokenization of governance disallows unilateral... See more

Social tokens have shown their efficiency on incentivizing individuals to share their skills with others. Projects that have succeeded in creating thriving communities all have strong Tokenomics. Tokenomics is a successful community’s superpower.

-What will be your source to determine compensation? Is it market based? person based? or internally augmented marketplace? who decides the rate?