Austin Castellaw

-A high value of yearn is having people take initiative and not having gated processes. An example of this is multiple private yearn telegram groups, but the problem is information was not trickling to the wider community

-Using coordinape as a performance evaluation tool and to reassess the expectations of member's contributions. DAOs can run into trouble knowing how available their members are especially if they are involved in multiple DAOs

The network nodes can verify the attached proofs several orders of magnitude faster and cheaper than verifying the computation itself, thus enabling complex computation at a pretty cheap cost, such as gaming dynamics.

Yet these two roles are in opposition to each other. A token needs to be exchangeable in order to be liquid. But the more liquid a token is, the less effective it can be as a pure signal of reputation. 

-People are more satisfied with their job when they know the process on how they are compensated and how their work is valued. 

Short answer is “No”…. But of course nothing is perfect! I will explain why and propose some possible solutions. But I also know the team behind Coordinape is working hard to constantly improve it! Let’s improve it all together and build the perfect tool!As it was mentioned above, one issue is members not allocating “properly”. Properly is probably... See more

To identify and reward the users who have contributed value to the platform—a form of signaling, which those users can parlay into public reputation.

-Yearn started just doing grants or gifts for contributors after they did great work. Some studies have shown that financial incentives can inhibit creativity. Coordinape is based on the gift economy where every month there is a budget and the members receive give tokens which they can give to people and people receive compensation based on those... See more