Austin Castellaw

-What will be your source to determine compensation? Is it market based? person based? or internally augmented marketplace? who decides the rate?

This is a fundamental shift in blockchain scaling.Running a game completely on-chain on a monolithic blockchain is economically unfeasible and will remain so for the foreseeable future. That is why most of the blockchain games that have been released in the past few years are in a hybrid form, having only a few components of their stack on-chain... See more

If you look at the social DAO landscape, you’ll see communities with different social token models. Some, like FWB, use a fungible social token to gate community access. Many emerging PFP-based communities like BAYC use NFTs as the primary community gating mechanism. Whether fungible or non-fungible, social tokens in DAOs usually represent three... See more

-Spencer describes how they use coordinape to reward people who chose a more flexible track where contributors work on projects and submit proposals on how much they should receive in compensation.

To provide a form of compensation that enables contributors to liquefy some of the value they have created into an exchangeable currency.

-Most atomize compensation by role and piece work. Perhaps a third way where something like core contributors have a base role and then are rewarded for extra work. Compensation can be hard to pin down for roles like business development or strategy.

Since the advent of Optimistic Rollups (ORUs) and Zk-Rollups (ZRUs), the paradigm has changed.Computation is run off-chain by high-end machines (the provers) while posting a fraud proof (on ORUs) or a validity proof (on ZRUs) on a settlement chain, which can prove the computation integrity, or in other words, that the computation has been executed... See more