Austin Castellaw

Short answer is “No”…. But of course nothing is perfect! I will explain why and propose some possible solutions. But I also know the team behind Coordinape is working hard to constantly improve it! Let’s improve it all together and build the perfect tool!As it was mentioned above, one issue is members not allocating “properly”. Properly is probably... See more

Coordinape offers a novel model for determining compensation in a way that can be more fair and reflective of actual contributions: since peers vote, there’s not as much emphasis on appeasing a single person, and power is more distributed throughout the organization.

In this third part, I’m going to cover utility. Utility is a subsection of the Demand side of the tokenomics equation. Even if a token has a great supply model, it still needs a good reason to exist and for people to hold it. Without those, there will be no demand for it, and no one will buy or hold it.

This is a fundamental shift in blockchain scaling.Running a game completely on-chain on a monolithic blockchain is economically unfeasible and will remain so for the foreseeable future. That is why most of the blockchain games that have been released in the past few years are in a hybrid form, having only a few components of their stack on-chain... See more

-What will be your source to determine compensation? Is it market based? person based? or internally augmented marketplace? who decides the rate?