Austin Castellaw
@austincastellaw
Austin Castellaw
Tokenomics and
0/ Token incentives are a popular way to distribute ownership to people that provide a useful service
But as we've seen, some of these distributions are easy to game and are less effective in hitting their key objectives
Here's my framework for thinking about this 👇
Ashwathtwitter.comairdrop and
1. How the community can participate towards meaningful objectives for the network (give tokens for work to be done)
Peter Yuan Pan • Tweet
-Trust and self-awareness are key to having conversations around performance and compensation. DAO tools are about facilitating hard conversations and personal growth.
Chase Chapman • Page not found
-People are much happier with the transparency of the give tokens. Coordinape does not solve the problem of social signaling as the most veteran visible members often receive the most recognition.
Aron Fischer • Compensation in DAOs with Tracheopteryx by Collectively Intelligent
And so when people are designing these incentive mechanisms and tokens, what types of factors are they considering? Whether it’s things like fairness or liquidity or security or the developer ecosystem, or I’m sure there’s plenty of other considerations. But what do you find that people are thinking about and tend to value? For some of the... See more
Unchained • The Tokenomics Episode: Why ‘EIP 1559 Is Like Catnip for Investors’
Since the advent of Optimistic Rollups (ORUs) and Zk-Rollups (ZRUs), the paradigm has changed.Computation is run off-chain by high-end machines (the provers) while posting a fraud proof (on ORUs) or a validity proof (on ZRUs) on a settlement chain, which can prove the computation integrity, or in other words, that the computation has been executed... See more
Thoughts on on-chain gaming
Valkyrie Protocol
valkyrieprotocol.com