Austin Castellaw

Chase Chapman:

-Most atomize compensation by role and piece work. Perhaps a third way where something like core contributors have a base role and then are rewarded for extra work. Compensation can be hard to pin down for roles like business development or strategy.

If more money is being extracted than what is being put in, then naturally the economy will eventually fall apart. Money doesn’t grow on trees after all, not even digital ones.

-People are much happier with the transparency of the give tokens. Coordinape does not solve the problem of social signaling as the most veteran visible members often receive the most recognition.

And is that like a W2 type situation or a 1099?

- compensation is about incentivizing people and what we want the DAO to actually accomplish and then find the straightest line between the money and the motivation.

-The commitment track is committing to prioritize the DAO over a certain time frame and then based on your experience you receive a base salary.

Should all three of these roles be represented by a single token? Which of them are a better match for fungible and non-fungible tokens?

And if nearly the entire audience who is playing the game is only there to make money, as soon as the earning possibilities go away so too does the audience, and then the game rapidly falls apart.